Archon turns finished research into submission-ready papers, with every citation and number checked. Run our skill packs in your own AI, let our agents do the work while you approve, or hand it to one of our editors. For universities, a licence for every researcher; for journals, AI peer review.
It is built to sound right, not to be right. In academic writing, that gap costs papers and reputations.
References that don’t exist or don’t say what’s claimed. Figures that appear nowhere in your data.
Generic, over-confident prose that claims more than your results show. Reviewers spot it in a paragraph.
Undisclosed AI use, no human answering for each claim, unpublished data pasted into a chat tool.
14 years and 3,250+ published manuscripts behind it, and not one of our 29+ Archon papers rejected for AI use.
The same rules sit under every one of them: nothing invented, every number traced, the author stays the author. What changes is who does the work, and for whom.
Load our skills into ChatGPT, Claude or Gemini and put a demanding reviewer, a journal recommender and a reviewer panel on call. Lite, Pro or Ultra: 3, 5 or 10 skills.
$49 · $129 · $249, one-time See the packsSpecialised agents turn a thesis, a dataset, a stalled draft or a rejected manuscript into a paper in your voice. Every citation confirmed, every number traced to your data, and nothing moves past a checkpoint without you.
The full system How Archon worksA native English-speaking scientific editor takes your manuscript through ten stages, from journal choice to pre-submission enquiries, and stays on when the reviews come back. For papers rejected more than once, or too important to automate.
By evaluation Meet your editorOne system for research offices, graduate schools and departments. Researchers publish finished work sooner, and every paper carries an audit trail your integrity office can inspect, disclosure-ready by default.
Institutional licence Archon for institutionsSeven independent reviewer seats and one editorial synthesis, prioritised P0 / P1 / P2, with integrity screening and a guide-for-authors audit. No “accept” while a critical flaw is open.
Pilot on 5 papers The Reviewer APIArchon, Human Archon and Archon for institutions run the same full process, from choosing the journal to answering the reviewers. They differ only in who does the work and how you pay for it. The skill packs are a few of those tools, run by you. The Reviewer API works for journals during peer review.
Scroll sideways to see all six stages →
Tell us who you are and how much of the work you want to hand over. We’ll point you to the product that fits.
How much of the work do you want to hand over?
We don’t ask the AI how to publish a paper. We learned that from thousands of reviewer reports, and wrote it down as rules. Our editors apply them by hand; the agents are made to follow them.
DownloadArchon white paper · PDF, 198 KBPick the journal and the gap the paper can own.
Say up front what is new and why it matters.
In the author’s own voice, without padding.
Every citation and number checked before submission.
Three things that never change, whoever does the work.
No reference that doesn't exist, no number that isn't in the data. When something can't be checked, it's flagged rather than guessed.
Nothing is published that the researcher didn't do or doesn't understand. Archon won't write past the evidence, and it won't help anyone claim work they haven't done.
Manuscripts and data are processed only to do the work, not kept afterwards, and never used to train a model.
Read our website privacy information. Before sharing manuscripts or research data, contact us to agree the scope of work and any data-processing requirements.
Archon comes from Journal Revisions: fourteen years of editorial, statistical and language work that gets papers past peer review. The people who did that work by hand designed the system that now does it with agents.
Anyone looking for a one-click paper generator. If the research hasn't been done, no product here will help publish it, and we'll tell you so.
More in the full FAQ →
Tell us what you have (a thesis, a dataset, a stalled draft or a rejected manuscript) and where you want it to go. We'll tell you plainly which way in fits, and whether we can help.